Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harrow House

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:44, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Harrow House

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Private English language school - definitely not notable. Bob Re-born (talk) 10:37, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:14, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete No evidence of any notability beyond its basic existence. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:33, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unlikely secondary schools, there is no presumption of notability for private language schools. Zero coverage other than the school's own website found in Ghits, Gnews and Gbooks. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 17:58, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - is there any possible case to be made that the subject is in any way notable? I think not. Fmph (talk) 04:16, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.