Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahul Singh ( Entrepreneur)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close. The article was speedy deleted by User:Bishonen per WP:G11, "Unambiguous advertising or promotion." North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:14, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rahul Singh ( Entrepreneur)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any real notability, all sources are to his own work. Also blatant puffery and like a publicity hand out. Slatersteven (talk) 19:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 20:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 20:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 20:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:BIO. Article creator has been very busy creating AFDs for notable Nepalis, including Members of Parliament, so editor's posting of puff pieces like this is very puzzling behaviour indeed. The Mighty Glen (talk) 20:14, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a puffed-up garbage pile of livejournal type sources culminating in a small pyre of Huffpost articles placed at its apex. Fails all known notability tests and checks within this realm.104.163.148.25 (talk) 04:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - doesn't meet any of the relevant notability criteria. Could be a candidate for speedy deletion as pure promotion. --bonadea contributions talk 06:38, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Per Bonadea's comment, and what was there, CSD seems reasonable and I have tagged for G11. Let's see if an admin agrees. !dave 10:43, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes. Pure advertising. I speedied it. Bishonen | talk 11:09, 16 February 2018 (UTC). And I have also speedied another article about a non-notable entrepreneur created by the same user, Tomas Samalionis, and posted a COI template on the user's page, asking them to state whether they have been recompensed for these creations. Bishonen | talk 11:21, 16 February 2018 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.