Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet of People

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The OR / notability deletion rationale remains uncontested. Sandstein 12:27, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Internet of People[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Queried speedy delete for copyvio Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:52, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The author of the aforementioned hackernoon piece (https://hackernoon.com/introducing-the-graphchain-2d20513bf713) has added a copyleft notice ("Work published under Creative Commons copyleft license. You are free to use this content at will.") supporting my claim that there is no copyright infringement.

Arcojuana (talk) 14:25, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That appears to be correct, so if that's the only issue, that could be solved with an attribution notice in the article. The other copyvio positives (Earwig) all seem to draw from that piece as well. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:49, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 14:53, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 14:53, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I feel this is largely a publication of original research, that hasn't attained independent notability as of yet. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:01, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, !dave 14:26, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:03, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.