Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kameni Nakamura
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 06:22, 13 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 08:20, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Kameni Nakamura (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of meeting WP:N's requirement of nontrivial coverage in multiple, reliable, third-party sources. The only coverage I could find in either English or Japanese was several iterations of his obituary (which mention little more than his death and that he was Japan's oldest man) and a handful of other trivial references about him becoming Japan's oldest man. Long-standing precedent is that simply being the oldest person in a country is not sufficient to meet the general notability guidelines and sustain an article, thus the extent of coverage (or lack thereof) is the issue here. Normally a redirect to a list might work, but he wasn't even a supercentenarian, so I'm not certain where he would be redirected to. Canadian Paul 20:43, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Like some of the previous centenarian articles nominated, this is a WP:BIO1E case, and the person has not received a sufficient level of in-depth coverage to justify a self-standing biographical article. --DAJF (talk) 02:11, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete without prejudice to re-creation. It is true that we have deleted many bios of very old persons in the past two years. The consensus is that the mere fact of being the oldest person at some time in the past does not per se confer notability. A better biography could be created with better, translated sources. Have you notified Wikipedia:WikiProject Japan? Bearian (talk) 22:24, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.