Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Jave

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 13:26, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Jave[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I had this as a prod but now looking at it-this seems more like an AFD. a person whose band has no page even. (only source was to Facebook) Wgolf (talk) 04:19, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

-Also oddly there is a tag from 2012 on the article which is more then 2 years before this article was made. Wgolf (talk) 04:19, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 06:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 06:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:33, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No evidence of notability. I took time to find references to reliable sources that establish its notability, all to no avail. Subject fails WP:GNG. The truth is, he is not notable. Article about him here is just WP:TOOSOON. Wikicology (talk) 19:18, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

strong delete definitely fails WP:MUSICBIO. LibStar (talk) 11:30, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.