Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal records forum
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete, snow close. I'll salt this to prevent recreation. I will also note that this is also fairly promotional in tone. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:29, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- Universal records forum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod deletion. This organisation does not have independent third party coverage that proves notability. Creator has attached link to Georgian Records Federation as proof (it is a partner of URF), but that is also not a notable record body itself and partnership with it does not explain why the organisation is notable. SFB 15:59, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- I believe this may be part of a WP:Walled garden. At any rate, please see related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suvodeep Chatterjee, created by the same editor. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:13, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Agree with WP:Walled garden. reddogsix (talk) 16:22, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Also agree with WP:Walled garden. Pincrete (talk) 18:49, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Yes to the walled garden, Suvodeep Chatterjee has been deleted multiple times by AfD - these should be salted.Peter Rehse (talk) 22:06, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.