The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Upmerge to Category:Executions at Plötzensee Prison - I don't thing that geography had much to do with the fate of victims; moreover, the various Bundesland categories are anachronistic to boot (executions took place to the end of WW2; the Bundesland system wasn't put together until the was was well over (1948 or 1949). Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:10, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I wouldn't be offended if someone did nominate them, if that's what you're asking for. But I do not agree that it wasn't an overly large category. --Nlu (talk) 22:02, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Upmerge this and all other "People from FOO executed at Plötzensee Prison" categories. Paging through them, most of the subcategories have one to ten people in them. Deleting the various subcategories will probably bring the category to around 200 or fewer articles, which isn't too many. However, if it is felt that they need to be diffused because it's too large, then I would respectfully submit that execution by (a) crime, (b) era, or in this case, (c) political regime, makes more sense than execution by place of origin of the executed. This particular prison was notorious during the Nazi era, so if there is any subdivision, I would make a "People executed at Plötzensee Prison during the Nazi regime" subcategory, which would fit into an existing Nazi-execution category tree. --Lquilter (talk) 16:16, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Best Special Effects Academy Award winners
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Delete. Should be either renamed "Conspiracy theories in the United States" per WP:NOTNEO (note that Wikipedia has no article on "Conspiracism" -- it's a redirect to "Conspiracy theory"), or deleted as a magnet for POV pushing. I'm of the view that "less is more" with regard to categories. Joe Bodacious (talk) 20:30, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The nomination steps are here. You basically did the last part and skipped all of the steps before that. You need to add the the filled out {{cfd}} or {{cfr}} to the category based on which you think is better. Since you are not sure what the outcome should be, either would be OK based on the wording in your nomination.
Delete one man's conspiracy theory is another person's fact. One would have been thought of as a conspiracy nut if he or she was certain that the gov't was following one's phone log a couple of weeks ago..... Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am not convinced we have a workable way to tag these things, however the word used her is so rare and obscure that I don't think we should take its use as of any value.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:08, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Rename per Obi-Wan. I'm uncomfortable with the neologism, but this seems like a legitimate topic to subdivide geographically. --BDD (talk) 02:15, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Rename per Obi-Wan. Note that there is already a category named Conspiracy theories[1], so this would be a sub-page of that page, and should bear the name "Conspiracy theories in the United States" following other category pages that follow the form 'XXX in YYY'. FurrySings (talk) 14:55, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
