Talk:Pio Point
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pio Point article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Merger proposal
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was Merge due to no objections raised. Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 20:49, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
I propose merging Prince Creek here. As Pio Point is the nearest feature (bordering it to the south) this article seems to be a logical place to have the content and is of a suitable size.
Please note the page Prince Creek was previously a candidate for deletion in 2007 BUT that AfD was concerning a housing development in the US, not the inlet of Bird Island. The present content of the article originates from 2017.Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 15:41, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Merge - It was tagged in 2017 as appearing to fall short of the notability requirement for geographical features. I've done a couple of searches now (2022) and there don't appear to be any new sources reporting on it since then. It's a small uninhabited creek containing no unique species / geology / shipwrecks etc. Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 15:44, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.