User talk:Neha.thakur75

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Neha.thakur75 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unreasonably blocked C.Fred when reverting the changes to stable version. I had reverted the changes done by getsnoopy. These changes are still being discussed so I reverted it to a stable version before getsnoopy's changes. But C.Fred immediately reverted these changes, so I had to undo his changes again. I left a message on C.Fred talk to share why I have reverted the changes but no luck Neha.thakur75 (talk) 21:07, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You received plenty of warning that your behavior was not acceptable, and you continued it anyway. Justifying your edit-warring will not get you unblocked; you need to explain what you will do differently going forward. Vanamonde (Talk) 22:35, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Welcome!

Hello, Neha.thakur75, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Abecedare (talk) 18:51, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Neha.thakur75 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unreasonably blocked C.Fred when reverting the changes to stable version Neha.thakur75 (talk) 21:07, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Based on what I can see, you were edit-warring to your preferred version, not a long-term stable version that existed previously. If I'm mistaken, please request another unblock and provide specific evidence (e.g. earlier versions of the page which already contained the edits you were edit-warring over, prior to your involvement). Yamla (talk) 21:21, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WT:Administrators

I don't know where you meant to put that text, but it doesn't go there. Seems like it belongs at an article talk page? --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:03, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Floquenbeam How do I get attention of administrator to get agreement ? The 2-3 people involved are not helping. I would like someone who can sensibly look into this issue. Neha.thakur75 (talk) 22:06, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you have 2-3 people at the talk page already participating in the discussion, then the answer is quite likely "just because they are disagreeing with you doesn't mean they aren't looking at it sensibly". Consider the possibility that you aren't right about it? In any case, administrators don't get involved in content disputes; it's dealt with thru discussion. You could leave a neutral request at a relevant Wikiproject talk page, asking for more people to look at the dispute. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:11, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Well I guess we got to involve more people. Neha.thakur75 (talk) 22:13, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Neha.thakur75, your response to Abecedare when he tried to help you doesn't inspire much confidence, so I'm going to be very direct with you. Your approach to this subject has been disruptive, and if you do not slow down and edit more collegially, you will be blocked not just from this single page, but from all of Wikipedia. You've honestly been very lucky so far; C.Fred would have been entirely justified in a sitewide block. If you would like to prevent that, here is what you need to do. 1) Stop edit-warring. 2) Read all the pages linked in the welcome message that you removed. 3) Stop posting notices everywhere about the dispute you are engaged in. Dozens of users have likely seen it at this point; if they're not engaging, it is probably because they don't have the patience to read long and angry exchanges. 4) Instead of repeating your assertions ad nauseum, provide evidence for them, in the form of reliable sources. The policy for naming articles is at Wikipedia:Article titles. Please read that page, and base any subsequent arguments on that policy, and in particular, on WP:COMMONNAME. Please take this warning seriously; I'm genuinely trying to help you continue to edit. Vanamonde (Talk) 22:32, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Vanamonde93 Please help me reach consensus on the correct transliteration of Raghuvanshi. I will tag you in the discussion.

As far as what I am going to do next - I will focus on getting consensus on the topic. I hope you will help Neha.thakur75 (talk) 22:54, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]