Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sound and The Fury (band)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 14:52, 11 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 20:53, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Sound and The Fury (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fr an article from January 2005 with hardly much information and change since then, my searches found absolutely nothing and it seems they may no longer exist and their website is closed. I was initially going to PROD but this seems better for comments and given the age (the article claims they performed at some Award shows but without good sources, there's simply not much). SwisterTwister talk 21:22, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:24, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nova Scotia-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:24, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Completely unsourced article which makes no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. If you squint hard enough, it could maybe be considered as hanging by its toenails off the edge of NMUSIC #7 ("most prominent of the local scene of a city"), but even that would have to be properly supported by RS coverage, and doesn't give a band a no-sourcing freebie just because you claim it. So I'm willing to revisit this if the sourcing can be substantively improved, but in this state it's a delete. Bearcat (talk) 19:28, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- I could not find significant coverage of the band in reliable sources. Jujutacular (talk) 03:37, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.