Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neel Sarovar Bhavesh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neel Sarovar Bhavesh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not yet notable. "Young scientist award" indicates this. The other awardsare similarly student awards, not national level awards for professional accomplishment at the highest level. DGG ( talk ) 08:43, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 08:51, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 08:51, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 08:51, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now at best as none of this suggests satisfying the applicable notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 08:51, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
'Young Scientist award" is given to independent scientist below age 35 by the National Academy of Sciences of India and this was given in 2009. After that he received award at the Indian Science Congress, the biggest science body in India. He has supervised three PhD students already and now he is the group leader. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neelsb (talk • contribs) 08:58, 29 December 2015 (UTC) — Neelsb (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Further, he is an editorial board member of Scientific Reports, A journal from Nature. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neelsb (talk • contribs) 09:13, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
IUPAC award is an international award. While awards from National Academy of Sciences, India and Indian Science Congress are reputed one given to Principal Investigators. He is senior researcher in a UN organisation.182.68.79.140 (talk) 17:08, 29 December 2015 (UTC) — 182.68.79.140 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete. WP:NOT YET. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:29, 30 December 2015 (UTC).[reply]
Delete per Xxanthippe. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 04:56, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
DO NOT Delete a well respected young scientist who rose fast. Just because he is coloured some people want it to be deleted. You must see his recent contribution on ALS disease. Profile of much less achievers are on wiki. Please do not see from a racist eye.14.139.62.210 (talk) 07:25, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep certainly biased if not racist view of DGG and others who failed to see that most of the awards are given by National academies. They are not student awards. He research work have been mentioned as news in journal like Nature. All references are cited. You can search his work on google. Biased views against Indian may be avoided.120.59.163.116 (talk) 13:29, 3 January 2016 (UTC) — 120.59.163.116 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete. WP:TOOSOON. Awards are too minor/junior for notability. He has a couple of well-cited publications but is in middle position in the author list of both, not enough to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF#C1. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:34, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per TOOSOON, etc. and admonish against the accusations of racism; there is significant WP:BIAS on Wikipedia, including against Indian, but DGG is one of the people at the forefront (along with Eppstein) of reminding people of this and looking deeper for more sources. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 01:30, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ Now it certainly proves that some biased people are on prowl. For them Indian National Science academies are of no value. International Union (IUPAC) are are not notable. Work on ALS and stress tolerance mechanism as lead researcher and news reports are also not notable according to some of commentator above with colonial mindset. For them anything even tiny in west is notable but Indian Science awards and associateship is small. Shame on you. You need to look at 17 references cited. His h-index is 15 and about 1000 citations of his publications. Strangely even this is not notable to some. 182.68.79.140 (talk) 03:24, 5 January 2016 (UTC)— 182.68.79.140 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Striking second vote by same SPA IP. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 10:04, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per DGG.Fails WP:PROF is upcoming but clearly not enough at this point to pass WP:PROF#C1 and also fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:12, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.