Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citizen Trump

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:10, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Citizen Trump

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A cable-news TV special, airing TODAY, and propped by a single newspaper preview listing and a partisan blog posting. Not even *close* to meeting notability guidelines, even technically. Calton | Talk 04:11, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:21, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:21, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:21, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:21, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This does not seem to be notable as it promotes a TV program which will most likely air once or twice and receive marginal rating and associated buzz. Cocoaguy ここがいい 06:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've converted the page to a redirect. No need to delete a page that serves a purpose. I vote to close this discussion to save time. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, this page serves no purpose since it's not a legitimate redirect term, nor is the underlying content useful or notable. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promoting your particular brand of agit-prop. And what part of Feel free to edit the article, but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed. in the AFD notice gave you difficulty? --Calton | Talk 16:06, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean the redirect does not serve a purpose? I am not looking to promote anything. I just want someone searching for information about Citizen Trump to be redirected to Donald Trump. This is very straightforward and an AfD discussion is not necessary. Since my conversion to a redirect page was undone, I'll cast my vote to redirect the article. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 19:28, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why would anyone be searching for information about a one-shot cable-news show on Wikipedia? Answer: one wouldn't and one shouldn't, your attempt to juice up the show's Internet presence (I.e., promote) notwithstanding. I repeat, it's not a legitimate redirect term. --Calton | Talk 05:04, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What on earth are you talking about? I am not trying to promote anything. This is a documentary film about a person. It is entirely appropriate to redirect a film about a person to the individual's Wikipedia article. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:23, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to either Donald Trump or Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016. MB298 (talk) 01:22, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:21, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. The question Why would anyone be searching for information about a one-shot cable-news show on Wikipedia? shows an indifference to current Wikipedia searches by our readers. WP provides the answer for many questions in todays Internet presence. Merge to campaign article. Buster Seven Talk 02:59, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016. Not notable enough for a standalone article, but noteworthy enough for mention in the Trump campaign article.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 19:15, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.