Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gene Hatfield

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 19:56, 19 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:28, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gene Hatfield[edit]

Gene Hatfield (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable artist. The sources that can be found point to a man who was known and respected in his community, but not beyond. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:38, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete – Sorry, but as the nominator pointed out; “…. a man who was known and respected in his community, but not beyond”. Looked and could only find one significant reference source [1] which as it turns out to be just a long obituary. ShoesssS Talk 15:10, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep There is at least one other source. [2]--MainlyTwelve (talk) 03:06, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Yes, there is that source. I'm on the fence about that. First, it's an encyclopedia of art and history of Arkansas; one might reasonably expect to find listed there any Arkansas artist. Second, the present article is such a close paraphrase of that source as to border on copyright violation. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:25, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:17, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:17, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:17, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 22:43, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:PROF#C5 (the distinguished professor title). And the local-news obituaries [4] [5] don't really contribute to notability themselves, but they mean we have sufficient sourced content for an article. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:24, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:00, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.