Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vikas Kapoor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:41, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vikas Kapoor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the references in the article are about his company, and most of the references I found myself are in a similar vein. There is no significant coverage to indicate he is anything more than a run-of-the-MILL CEO (especially in a market saturated with cloud-based companies). Primefac (talk) 16:26, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 00:45, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete insufficient coverage in reliable, secondary sources. Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:33, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks wp:notability Shrikanthv (talk) 07:58, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now as this at first simply seems like an ordinary businessman's article so there's nothing outstanding for better improvement and independent notability, delete for now at best. SwisterTwister talk 07:03, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.