Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Distributional cost-effectiveness analysis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Please propose a merge on the article's talk page . A Train^talk 13:09, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Distributional cost-effectiveness analysis[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dictionary article Rathfelder (talk) 11:04, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 16:07, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 09:06, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:48, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – A notable topic, and the article can be expanded. Scholarly source examples include [1], [2], [3]. Not seeing how omission of this topic from the encyclopedia would improve the encyclopedia. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:37, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 15:49, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It would be better merged with Cost-effectiveness analysis. Rathfelder (talk) 07:08, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to cost-effectiveness analysis. Insufficient content for an article currently. Sandstein 07:34, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.