Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Keeling
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 14:36, 25 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 14:36, 25 March 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:05, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Paul Keeling[edit]
- Paul Keeling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It is not clear to me that this person meets the notability criteria. Prod removed without the addition of sources. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:47, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Keeling plays in the seventh tier of English football, so this fails WP:ATH. Cmprince (talk) 12:46, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:25, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:26, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:26, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- We do not need articles on every minor league footballer, hardly even on theri clubs. The article is created by user:Primetime222, which would seem from the subject's nickname, to be an alias for the subject. Accordingly this is autobiography, and a clear case of WP:COI. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:09, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:ATH is clear that you have to be fully professional. As a semi-professional it's close, but no cigar. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 18:10, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable WP:ATHLETE failure with no independent coverage in reliable sources. --ClubOranjeT 09:55, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. GiantSnowman 12:11, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 12:12, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not a notable footballer Spiderone 12:16, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not a notable footballer at all -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:26, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete a long way off meeting WP:ATH or WP:GNG. --Jimbo[online] 13:52, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per nom. GauchoDude (talk) 03:50, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, obviously. The original version of this article looked like a joke article, and it was only after the article was PRODded that the article's creator rewrote in a way that looks plausible. I think it may be a hoax, but anyway it's not notable. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:31, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Not a hoax, he is shown in the playing squad on the official Retford United website. But you are right that he has not played at a notable level -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:51, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.