Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Mangano
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 01:57, 18 April 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 01:57, 18 April 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 14:45, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Frank Mangano (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability for the person. Sure his book got to number 4 briefly in Amazon's Books > Health, Mind & Body > Aging > Diabetes category (currently No. 91) but does that make it notable? — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 00:41, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; author of article appears to be using Wikipedia to post biographical articles. (I deleted a second one posted earlier today.) --Ckatzchatspy 02:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:08, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep sourced here.www.naturalnews.com/026696_meat_health_cancer.html [unreliable fringe source?] Ikip (talk) 01:22, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. That link takes us to an article that he wrote. How does that support his notability? Location (talk) 03:12, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Insufficient notability to meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:44, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:GNG, is not the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources, GS search suggest he also fails WP:PROF (claims to be a researcher) due to lack of evidence of impact on world of ideas. Pete.Hurd (talk) 06:29, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Link above says that he's a "citizen journalist", which is not inherently notable when lacking significant coverage Corpx (talk) 09:00, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.