Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jody Mabry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 14:27, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jody Mabry

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage in reliable sources to verify or sustain article. Jbh ^Talk 13:24, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: as utterly lacking in notability. Quis separabit? 16:08, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not live up to WP:CREATIVE criteria Qasaur (talk) 18:27, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Possibly it's just WP:TOOSOON for this author of children's chapter books who is also a ghostwriter. Ghostwriters can be notable. Problem is a news search on his name turns up noting at all (with or without middle initial), and his blog lists no published reviews, only a string of reviews on what seem to be blogs. He is interviewed by online literary sites [1] , [2]. But I think he would need a little more than that to pass WP:AUTHOR.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:36, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unfortunately, since JM's a good writer, hopefully JM will be back in Wikipedia when there are more WP:RS.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:59, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.