Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerua Baba

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 02:33, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gerua Baba

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Also nominating:

Can't find anything on this other than Wikipedia mirrors. The prod was removed with a "please read references" edit summary but there is nothing on the web that corresponds to those two references either. regentspark (comment) 11:52, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:06, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regentspark, the article seems to almost completely overlap with Gerua Baba Temple, which was created by the same editor(s). Do you think the temple is notable? Uanfala (talk) 16:52, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not even sure if it exists. I googled "Gerua Baba Temple" and all I can see are wikipedia mirrors. --regentspark (comment) 22:31, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I've also just bundled Gerua Baba Temple into this Afd as the same reasoning applies to it. Uanfala (talk) 13:03, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The "references" consist of bare titles that don't seem to have left any trace on either worldcat or google. A google search for the Hindi name returns 21 results, only three of which aren't wikipedia mirrors. Only one of these three seems to be likely to be about the topic of this article. Nowhere near enough for even keeping this as a redirect to Hanuman. Uanfala (talk) 12:58, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment – Note that Gerua Baba Temple has also been nominated for deletion in this discussion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:10, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:09, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 01:32, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 17:46, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.