Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gold Souk Grande Kochi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarah-Jane (talk) 10:22, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gold Souk Grande Kochi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

apparently promotional article on non-notable mall. DGG ( talk ) 20:21, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 23:14, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:31, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:32, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 20:07, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - These subjects won't get much of the coverage needed here at WP so delete until a better article is made. SwisterTwister talk 07:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, but somebody should consider writing an article about the chain Gold Souk, to which this and the other articles about individual shopping centers could be redirected. --MelanieN (talk) 17:08, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree that a chain article or a list of the members of the chain would be a better outcome than deletion. VMS Mosaic (talk) 12:42, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no evidence of sufficient coverage. Vanamonde93 (talk) 06:56, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.