Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Stephen J. Press
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 16:57, 13 May 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 16:33, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Dr. Stephen J. Press (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable person. Also an autobiography. Prod denied by author. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:32, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE This article appears to be an autobiography in contravention of WP:AUTOBIO. Moreover, it and its associated articles (i.e., International Federation of Sports Chiropractic and Sports chiropractic) appear to be self-promotion in that they promote the field in which the subject of the autobiograpy earns his livelihood, as well as the practitioner himself, in contravention of WP:COI. The conflict of interest issues are all the more apparent when one notices that the category listing, of which the autobiography forms a part, has the effect of directing Wikipedians to the autobiography and its subject’s associated articles, to each of which the subject of the autobiography is a major contributor. There is an interconnectedness between these three articles and the category listing collecting them all that raises a red flag as regards Wikipedia’s conflict of interest guidelines. — SpikeToronto (talk) 22:53, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Good faith searches do not turn up evidence of notability. Only book attributed to him is self-published. COI, while proving nothing, appears to be the only reason for inclusion. Bongomatic 01:25, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, promotional. Abductive (reasoning) 05:48, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.