Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pindolonan National High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as per positive consensus and the absence of calls for deletion outside of the nominator. The question of BLP concerns and sourcing as connected to this article can easily be addressed through editing. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended (talk) 00:21, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pindolonan National High School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

has some BLP issues, additionally no sources, and probably not notable Go Phightins! (talk) 21:35, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES and Wikipedia:Notability (high schools), secondary schools are typically considered as appropriate for having a stand-alone article. Northamerica1000^(talk) 22:12, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reply OK, that may satisfy notability (I still contend that's questionable at best), but there are still some BLP issues. I know that this is not a BLP, but unsourced information about living people doesn't conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy. Finally, there are no sources in the whole article which violates WP:OR. Go Phightins! (talk) 02:08, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Lenticel ^(talk) 00:44, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Lenticel ^(talk) 00:46, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per longstanding practice for secondary schools of confirmed existence. "No Original Research" is synonymous with "No Crackpot Theories," not "No Writing Pages About Topics That There Aren't Books Written About." Existence of school is confirmed. Carrite (talk) 04:28, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but add sources per User:Bearian/Standards#Notability_of_High_Schools_at_WP:AfD. Bearian (talk) 18:10, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. General consensus is that all secondary schools are notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:33, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Keep. As much as I don't agree with inherent notability of secondary schools, consensus is consensus, and as such, it is presumed notable. Such a shame there aren't more sources. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:00, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.