Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Eminem discography/archive1
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 19:52, 21 May 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was retained by SchroCat 08:19, 7 November 2014 [1].
Eminem discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list removal candidates/Eminem discography/archive1
- Featured list removal candidates/Eminem discography/archive2
| Toolbox |
|---|
I am nominating this for featured list removal because the article is too bloated to meet FL criteria. Its lead is overly detailed with five paragraphs. There are also some bare URLS, malformatted refs (i.e. incorrect uses of italics/capitals), and many dead refs. I'm not convinced it is easy to navigate with the giant amount of content- the article is WP:TOOBIG at ~151k and should be split into "Eminem albums discography", "Eminem singles discography", and "Eminem videography". Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:24, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose this is one if the least worrying arguments I can find for current FLs. There are a ton of FLs that have too little intro, and I would rather have FLRC energy spent on that instead. Also, the videography itself couldn't even pass the FL 10-entries threshold. Nergaal (talk) 12:26, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per Nergaal, non-worrysome issues. This list seems to be in good condition and the lead seems to cover everything, well-sourced and all. Gloss • talk 02:25, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been retained as a featured list, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. - SchroCat (talk) 08:23, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.