Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yardly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:57, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yardly

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a small company that deals with the frequent problem Canadians have of getting rid of large amounts of snow. I declined a WP:CSD#A7 request because there are some small local news pieces, but otherwise nothing that obviously shows the company has long-lasting national prominence. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:02, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alberta-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:40, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: smacks to me of business promoting. Quis separabit? 16:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as by far nothing minimally convincing of any actual notability here. SwisterTwister talk 06:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this article reads like an advertisement. In any case, it is a local operation, and the sources go to its website, google app store, an article in "Edmonton Metro" that reads like a press release, and so on. There is no persuasive indication of notability. Steve Quinn (talk) 06:59, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.