Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Co-operative Electrical
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:08, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
- The Co-operative Electrical (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nothing notable I could find online, and typed up to the point of promotional use per WP:NOTADVERTISING. JudeccaXIII (talk) 20:20, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The most important content is already in The Co-operative Group as a summary. Cloudbound (talk) 21:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:34, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:34, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete/Redirect: The relevant information is already stated elsewhere as a paragraph in The_Co-operative_Group#Current. I am not seeing anything to indicate that a free-standing article on this subsidiary meets WP:CORPDEPTH or is otherwise needed. AllyD (talk) 07:20, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as nothing at all suggesting the needed solid independent notability here. SwisterTwister talk 04:18, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.