Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:26, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rockto

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a seemingly defunct Indonesian tech startup. Most of the cited references and indeed the official site for the company are 404 links. What references remain only assert that the site exist and the depth of coverage doesn't seem to meet WP:CORP. A search for the company on Crunchbase shows only one update: the company's launch in 2011, and nothing since. It's a pity to kill an article about a company from a part of the world that's underrepresented on the EnWiki but I don't think this one can be saved. A Train^talk 07:24, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:48, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:48, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:59, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:41, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- I'm not able to find anything either. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:38, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:40, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it stands without prejudice - David Gerard (talk) 22:49, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as entirely PR and none of it amounts to substance. SwisterTwister talk 23:10, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.