Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regal Furniture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:02, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regal Furniture

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only a single reference which doesn't mention the article subject. No evidence of notability nor of its claim to notability as "... the largest exporter of processed wooden, LB & metal products". Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:40, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Cannot find any further sources for notability evidence.JackTracker (talk) 22:52, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Subject lacks any coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 23:30, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 03:59, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 03:59, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: as promotional article. Quis separabit? 20:18, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SNOW Delete and I honestly consider this A7 and G11 material. SwisterTwister talk
Delete -- "corporate spam" with insufficient sources to meet GNG and CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:51, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As this is nearly A7-worthy and has nowhere near enoug coverage to meet WP:GNG. Omni Flames (talk) 11:13, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.