Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Shia Day

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:41, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

International Shia Day

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No source included. Can not find any third party source for this event. I have tried google news, scholar and book search. - Mar11 (talk) 18:08, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 18:09, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:09, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:09, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Zilch on GNews, GScholar and GBooks, and in my case only 244 hits for a regular Google search, ergo fails WP:GNG. - HyperGaruda (talk) 18:22, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as still questionable for solid notability and its improvements. SwisterTwister talk 22:12, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 04:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: as a modern event, one would expect it to have significant internet coverage if it is notable, but no such coverage exists. There are hits for the organisers websites, but nothing third party that is not self-published. All of this makes it fail WP:GNG. — crh ₂₃ (Talk) 06:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This event does not satisfy general notability guideline. --Dcirovic (talk) 02:47, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.