Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giraffe Restaurants

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:44, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Giraffe Restaurants

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable beyond its affiliation with Tesco. (If this must be kept, can someone please scrub it for copyright violations if it hasn't already been cleaned because its creator, Animal91X, has been indefinitely blocked for creating copyright violations.)Laun chba ller 17:37, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Independent coverage in The Times plus one ref I've added to the BBC news site makes it pass notability for companies. I don't see that there is enough text in the article for copyright to be an issue. Philg88 ^♦talk 08:01, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The takeover by Tesco was widely covered in British media, and seen as an important milestone in the development of the supermarket industry.[1][2][3] There's also a wide variety of other news stories about their actions, with coverage in national publications[4][5] and store openings being reported in local/regional press.[6][7][8][9] --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:22, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable enough, although more info should be added. Caterer and Hotelkeeper could be handy for that. The Banner talk 10:07, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Notability has been clearly demonstrated above. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:47, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Colapeninsula who's found alot of reliable sources, Clearly notable. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:34, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.