Jump to content

User talk:Cam5643

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cam5643 (talk | contribs) at 20:42, 30 May 2022 (→‎Block evasion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Block evasion

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cam5643 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

after adding a citation in the following page I´m blocked with no explanation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mbalax ICam5643 (talk) 17:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

An explanation has been provided and appears to be accurate. Yamla (talk) 18:23, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No, you were blocked for evading this block. Note that meatpuppetry and sockpuppetry are both equally blockable. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:11, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It´s a lie I added a citation and have been blocked with no explanation. It´s my first account on this website. Once again it´s a lie, you aree welcome to do a WP:SPI.

Given the timing WP:MEATPUPPET applies here, which is also blockable. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This does not apply to my account, I´m new the timimg says nothing about me or my account. Millions of users are on this website daily and at the same time. You argument is not valuable. Cam5643 (talk) 18:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I´m taking this dispute to the Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents you have no reason to block my account.

I tried to make a request on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard OhNoitsJamie Talk also bloked me on that page


This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Cam5643 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I´m trying to resolve this problem with you again you blocked my account without any concrete proof. I can´t even file a dispute resolution. Wikipedia ban policies WP:BAN that you are not respecting. Cam5643 (talk) 20:42, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I´m trying to resolve this problem with you again you blocked my account without any concrete proof. I can´t even file a dispute resolution. Wikipedia ban policies WP:BAN that you are not respecting. [[User:Cam5643|Cam5643]] ([[User talk:Cam5643#top|talk]]) 20:42, 30 May 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I´m trying to resolve this problem with you again you blocked my account without any concrete proof. I can´t even file a dispute resolution. Wikipedia ban policies WP:BAN that you are not respecting. [[User:Cam5643|Cam5643]] ([[User talk:Cam5643#top|talk]]) 20:42, 30 May 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I´m trying to resolve this problem with you again you blocked my account without any concrete proof. I can´t even file a dispute resolution. Wikipedia ban policies WP:BAN that you are not respecting. [[User:Cam5643|Cam5643]] ([[User talk:Cam5643#top|talk]]) 20:42, 30 May 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

is closed. User should make an unblock request here, asking that their appeal be carried to WP:AN. As someone with no idea what's going on, in theory, I'd be happy to do so, but in full sight of the community. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:17, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]