Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Unit
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 13:46, 5 June 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:24, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- American Unit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The sources provided are marginal, and quite a few are press releases, which do not confer notability (most press release websites will publish anything and not even remove it when it's reported a fraud). I doubt this company's notability, but realize that it's marginal. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 00:35, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unremarkable "technology services organization." I agree with the nom that, while it looks like there are a lot of sources, they are mainly primary, and don't add up to significant coverage in independent sources. See WP:B2B. Dawn Bard (talk) 15:58, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 11:55, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Lack of good sources listed and couldn't find better ones. Stormbay (talk) 22:53, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.