Talk:Mayonnaise
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mayonnaise article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
Untitled
Mayonnaise is an emulsion of primarily oil and AIR - jamusdouglus@yahoo.com - perhaps someone more wiki competent than i would like to do the editing!
Miscellaneous stuff
Does the acid of the vinegar/lemon juice have any particular function in the emulsifying process? AxelBoldt 02:42 Oct 10, 2002 (UTC)
I am fairly certain that mayonnaise (the sauce, not the name) is a Spanish invention. But I'm too new to edit entries yet.
Is not Mayonnaise, but Mahonesa and it is whole egg and oil, nothing else, seasoning with salt. Origin from Mahon, Menorca (Spain). Mahonesa means literally "from Mahon".
Cold? The article says that it's a cold sauce. The widespread availabiloty of room-temperature packets of mayo in sandwich shops shows that "cold" is not a core characteristic of mayo. 174.242.139.199 (talk) 16:47, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Unsourced history
There is some rather remarkable history here to have no attribution of sources. -- Jmabel 22:35, 5 Jan 2004 (UTC)
- Over half a year since I asked, and still no references cited. -- Jmabel 02:08, Aug 25, 2004 (UTC)
- Which is the fact that requires more referencing? The rest is deductions of logic, as most history is. recently I added the following opening sentence to the entry Excalibur (movie): "Excalibur is a 1981 film directed by John Boorman, which was a creative innovation in remaking the legend of King Arthur, a gritty and violent anti-Camelot that sparked a new Arthurian film-making style that leads in an unbroken sequence to Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings." Seemed to me like a perceptive, balanced assessment, but you might say, "Where's the proof?" Wetman 02:48, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Look at the first few paragraphs of the section "The origin of sauce Mayonnaise". This is not the sort of thing someone just knew off the top of their head. A charitable assumption is that someone did some research but neglected to cite his/her sources. An uncharitable guess would be that this is either (on the one hand) plagiarized or (on the other) made up. This kind of historical detail should usually be accompanied by a citation. -- Jmabel 05:38, Aug 25, 2004 (UTC)
- The conclusion, inferred from the logic of the quoted references, is mine. I don't know the title of the 1841 cookbook, but I've added an OED reference. You object to a step in the logic? or to one of the facts? Which is the suggestion that needs to be expanded? Notice the use of the expression "it may appear more credible" Apparently it doesn't appear more credible to a connoisseur of culinary history such as User:Jmable. Tant pis. Wetman 05:51, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
The OED reference helps a lot. Up till that addition, there was no clue where someone would go to verify this. -- Jmabel 16:04, Aug 25, 2004 (UTC)
- Got a better reference! The suggestion about the duc de Mayenne was first made by culinary writer Pierre Lacam, but whether in Mémorial historique et géographie de la patisserie (privatetly printed, Paris 1908), Nouveau patissier glacier français et étranger (1865) or Glacier classique et artistique en france et en italie, (1893) I can't tell. My bet's on the 1893 title. A reference is now added to the entry at External link. Wetman 05:39, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Questions on the 01:42, 23 Jan 2005 revision
I liked a lot of the revisions to the English. Some questions:
- Why mention tarragon in the introduction? It is just one of many seasoning that could be added; most mayonnaise recipes that I've seen don't have tarragon.
- There was a reference to unspecified "other seasonings." The only seasoning whose presence doesn't change the name of the sauce is tarragon. BtW, finely chopped parsley makes "green mayonnaise:" shouldn't that be mentioned among the variations? --Wetman 16:11, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- On the other hand, why move the reference to mother sauce out of the first paragraph? If mayonnaise is a mother sauce, that is an important fact to highlight prominently right up front.
- Yes it is indeed. Suit yourself. --Wetman 16:11, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- What does "Other seasonings call for other names (see below)" mean?
- It means that the addition of other seasonings calls for the application of other names, such as those listed immediately beneath— "Thousand Island dressing" etc. --Wetman 16:11, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
No references to salmonella
One common issue re: mayonnaise is its role in salmonella poisoning. I actually came to wikipedia to look up rules on how long mayonnaise can be out of the refrigerator, and was surprised not to find anything.
- C-Class France articles
- Low-importance France articles
- All WikiProject France pages
- C-Class Spain articles
- Low-importance Spain articles
- All WikiProject Spain pages
- B-Class Food and drink articles
- High-importance Food and drink articles
- WikiProject Food and drink articles
- Etymology Task Force etymologies
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press