Talk:Alex Chalk
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Article Cleanup
Following edits by user @KJB2017: after initial cleanup by @C.Fred: and @Rathfelder::
Actions for you to take
- Please re-add information on local campaigns, in a neutral way, with more depth.
- Please find more non-primary sources to back up all tagged statements
- Please find sources to sources for the "Early life" section.
Do NOT edit this page if you have a conflict of interest.
Actions I've taken
Early life
- Added citation needed and BLP sources templates
Whilst normally unsourced information in BLPs would be deleted, as this is not potentially libelous or damaging I am willing to let users source it if they can. If not sourced soon, I will delete it.
Justice Select Committee
- Removed list of inquires
- Removed all external links
- Edited for clarity and conciseness
- Section header removed
There is no need to include list of all inquiries as not directly related to Chalk - more suited to Justice Select Committee Page. Made more concise and kept otherwise.
All party-parliamentary groups
- Deleted in entirety
Copyright violation, copied straight from source
Stalking
- Edited for clarity and conciseness
- Edited for neutrality
- Removed unnecessary quotes
- Section header removed
This is a relevant section, I am glad it was added. However, it was excessive and written like an advertisement.
EU
- Edited for clarity and conciseness
- Edited for tone
- Section header removed
Local Campaigns
- Deleted in entirety
Whilst a section entitled 'Local Campaigns' would be beneficial, at the time it contained only a list of campaigns and one primary source. Re-add when you have secondary sources and more than just a list of names.
Controversies
- Re-added section entitled 'Fraud Investigation'
This is a relevant section and written relatively neutrally. If you have an issue with the way it is written you may edit it, but do not delete it in its entirety.
Hope this helps and feel free to ask me for help or clarification. Legendiii 22:49, 7 May 2017 (UTC) (find me here).
Lead Template Messages
I now believe that this article no longer requires the following template messages above the lead:
{{BLP sources}}
- Reason: Now sufficiently covered by section template message
{{BLP sources section}}
- Reason: Now sufficiently covered by section template message
{{BLP primary sources}}
- Reason: Only applies to one source, sufficiently covered by inline tag
Any disagreement?
Thanks, Legendiii (talk) 12:46, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Partly done: new additions since suggestion rely on primary sources, so {{BLP primary sources}}
stays. Legendiii (talk) 13:31, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
children?
In the ‘quick facts’ it states he has two children, but under ‘personal life’ it states that he has three! Nikrehg (talk) 21:59, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
COI
Large sections of this article reads like it always written by a parliamentary researcher/someone promoting the subject 146.198.237.181 (talk) 06:46, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class England-related articles
- Low-importance England-related articles
- WikiProject England pages
- C-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles