User talk:Favre1fan93

Happy Holidays

★Trekker (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Happy Holidays!

—El Millo (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Drafts

I really think that you and the others should stop creating episode articles in the draft namespace and instead work on it in your userspace. If editors like that are going to jump over your heads then at least make it harder for them finding those drafts. Gonnym (talk) 12:13, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

I think that's a bit of an overreaction to one page being moved. It would just make it harder for everyone to edit and people would still make drafts not knowing that the info was in some random userspace. -- Zoo (talk) 14:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

I was about to comment the same thing. Hopefully we can avoid another situation like this after the discussion on WT:MCU is resolved. InfiniteNexus (talk) 15:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Family Law

Hello. Could you help me with some advise, pleace? There is a TV show on The CW that already broadcasted for two seasons, in Italy, and renewed for the third. But there is no reliable source in whole internet, that season 2 was broadcasted at all. The episodes exist, and there is this unreliable source, and that's all. What can be done for the show article and for many actors articles? For example, Erica Cerra doesn't have a word about being her a regular in the show. Thank you. IKhitron (talk) 16:09, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Well, I suppose you've decided to ignore my question, because there is no answer "I don't know" here. I'm surprised, and next will not ask you for help. IKhitron (talk) 11:55, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

@IKhitron: Sorry, things were busy and I forgot to respond. Do any of the following help you? [1], [2], [3] - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:44, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

As I already said, I searched a lot. I'm not asking for help to search, I'm asking what to do if there is a fact, but there is no source. IKhitron (talk) 02:55, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 17:44, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Avengers

I think your updates to the Avengers articles re: listing all the sequels is the right move, but I do think having Age of Ultron, Infinity War, and Endgame all as headings in the TOC for The Avengers (2012 film) but no sections for the new films or even an "Other"/"Future" section seems like it is putting a lot of emphasis on the fact that we are excluding them without actually explaining it to readers. I'm just wondering if it makes sense to condense those into a single "Sequels" section like Age of Ultron has, and maybe in the cases where we are specifically excluding future films we should say "direct sequel" somewhere as a way to explain that we are only including the ones that are actually sequels? - adamstom97 (talk) 08:18, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

I disagree with keeping The Avengers' sequel section all separated like that. Each film doesn't need its own subsection, and each one of those subsections is too short to be justified. Once those two other films are released, we could have two subsections, one for the Infinity Saga and one for the Multiverse Saga. But for now, with less than one line for those two films, that would also be unnecessary. —El Millo (talk) 17:17, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

I think it's appropriate to mention on Endgame's article about the two, but beyond that, I don't see the need on the other three proceeding films. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:39, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

If you're saying that we don't need to mention the two newly-announced films in the Sequel section of the first three Avengers films, I agree with you in principle, but we'd have to be constantly battling with editors adding it in. But about the individual subheadings, why do you think that's important to keep? That goes for @Adamstom.97 too, I see no use for it. —El Millo (talk) 21:18, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

I'm fine with removing the subheadings. If this needs to be a larger discussion not just on my page, sure, since we should then adjust the other franchise articles like Cap and Thor's pages. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:25, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Oh great. I don't think we need a larger discussion, I'll just reinstate the edit at The Avengers and see the rest of the articles later. We'll wait on what Adamstom has to say on the inclusion of the two new Avengers films to see if we keep them or remove them. —El Millo (talk) 21:33, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

If it is just a single section for "Sequels" that only includes the first three and mentions "direct sequels", or something like that, to explain why the new two aren't included, then that aligns with my thoughts. I agree with adjusting the other franchises, we don't really need subheadings for each sequel if the sections are going to be such short summaries. - adamstom97 (talk) 22:05, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Amazing job continuing to keep all of the MCU articles in-line, especially getting all of the little details and updates right after Comic Con. It's great to still be working with you on these articles after all these years. adamstom97 (talk) 03:21, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

@Adamstom.97: Thank you Adam! Likewise - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:45, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Daredevil: Reboot or Revival?

Hello There, Favre. This is regarding Daredevil: Born Again. Is it a revival or a reboot as Vincent D'Onofrio and Charlie Cox are reprising their role here. Seaweed Brain1993 (talk) 15:10, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) It's a revival. — SirDot (talk) 15:19, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

I frankly think we have to wait see. If they start the series with some explanation about this being a different universe from the original, I wouldn't call it a revival. BD2412 T 16:56, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

The Defenders/The Punisher

Hello Favre1fan93,

I noticed that you were working on numerous Marvel pages. Because I do not master Wikipedia's tabs completely, I wondered if you could add a Primetime Emmy Award nomination (2018) for Outstanding Original Main Title Theme Music for The Defenders, as sourced on the Emmy Award official website here and here, and a BMI TV Award received by The Punisher in 2020, as sourced on Variety here and on the official website here.

If you cannot/do not want to make these edits, no worries.

Regardless, have a nice day. 129.194.0.220 (talk) 23:13, 27 July 2022 (UTC)