Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Mullen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:30, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Mullen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of an unelected political figure, not adequately sourced as having a strong notability claim. The claim here is that he's a former chief of staff to the speaker of a provincial legislature, which is not an "inherently" notable role that guarantees a free pass into Wikipedia -- he would have to pass WP:GNG on his sourceability to warrant a Wikipedia article.
But there are just two footnotes here, both of which are relatively short and unsubstantive sources that just cover him in the context of having briefly been in the news for investigating allegations of other people's impropriety, in other words doing his job. For the record, one of the two people he investigated was formally charged and the other was not, but this article isn't telling you that, and there are WP:BLP problems arising from its failure to tell you that — this was most likely created as a WP:COATRACK to get the criminal allegations into Wikipedia for "naming and shaming" purposes without actually trying to write WP:PERP-failing BLPs of the people Mullen investigated.
This simply isn't of enough enduring significance to justify an article that's this unsubstantive and minimally sourced. Bearcat (talk) 03:34, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Canada. Bearcat (talk) 03:34, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Chief of staff to a provincial speaker is not a role that would make him notable and the scandal-related stuff won’t stand up a bio on its own. Mccapra (talk) 12:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:20, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.