A2: To add or remove images, start a thread on this page first. See WP:FP? and WP:IMAGE.
Q3: Why was my external link removed?
A3: To prevent bloat and clutter, new links must first gain talk-page consensus. See WP:EL.
Q4: The name of the article should be Calcutta, not Kolkata!
A4: Consult the archives of this talk page for discussions regarding the naming of the article. As of February 2012, the last discussion and voting regarding this issue was completed on 31 January 2012, and result of the move request was: No clear consensus to move this title, either name is appropriate for the article and no one made compelling Commonname arguments for either name over the other.
Q5: Why is person "X" not named in the article, although he/she is an accomplished person related to Kolkata?
A5: There is no strict inclusion and exclusion criteria for accomplished personalities mentioned in the article, although a working set of criteria is in the process of development. Some individuals such as Rabindranath Tagore or Mother Teresa are very significantly associated with Kolkata, while there are many others whose contribution or significance may not be as important. The significance level is a matter of subjective analysis, and there is room for discussion for each individual person. The following set of guidelines is recommended. The person need not meet all the criteria.
a. The person should be notable enough to have a separate wiki article.
b. Individual reliable inline secondary citations proving the notability in the Kolkata article must be given.
c. There should be significant contribution to his/her field of expertise.
d. The person received prestigious international or national awards or was nominated.
e. The person is or has been an elected member of a highly selective prestigious scholarly society or association,
f. The person is in a field of literature (e.g writer or poet) or the fine arts (e.g. musician, composer, artist), and meets the standards for notability in that art, such as WP:CREATIVE or WP:MUSIC and his/her work is well recognised as evident from reliable secondary sources.
g. The person must have born, or lived, or studied or worked significantly in Kolkata, that is, the person should be related to Kolkata significantly.
h. The name(s) should be added in such a manner that it should not look like a laundry list, rather it should flow into a prose.
i. Please discuss in the talk page prior to addition of a name. Please see Question a in the FAQ section to be aware that dits can be removed.
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Kolkata is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia articles
This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on January 19, 2012.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
It says: "By the 1850s, Calcutta had two areas: White Town, which was primarily British and centred on Chowringhee and Dalhousie Square; and Black Town, mainly Indian and centred on North Calcutta." This simply isn't possible, the European element of Calcutta according to the 1901 census were 11,425 British in the city, the total population being 949,144 - so the British were roughly 1% of the population. Even though the Europeans may have enjoyed more personal living space, it's abundantly clear that aside from a few streets and tiny enclaves like Chowringhee and Dalhousie Square, the metropolis was (demographically speaking) overwhelmingly Indian in virtually all geographical areas. To say that the Indians mainly centred on the north, presumably leaving the other vast areas of the vast city (East, West, South, central) dominated by or with a substantial presence of Europeans, is clearly FALSE. One source given for this statement is this tiny article: https://web.archive.org/web/20120112023055/http://www.laits.utexas.edu/solvyns-project/hardgraveportrait.html - in this short article I can find no reference to anything about any so-called "white town" nor any information about Calcutta's erstwhile racial demographics, nor anything relating to the 1850's! Instead it's about an artist that drew some nice drawings of city life between 1791-1804. The second source given was a book "Calcutta through 300 years: Changing visions, lasting images" - which I admit I haven't read, but it appears to be a coffee table picture book, with postcard and artists impressions of the city over a period of a few centuries, a glossy unofficial souvenir book published to mark the city's 300th anniversary (1990), very nice I'm sure, but not really an academic source I think. Zac 26/11/19 - — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8000:109b:cb00:e161:5eec:6a8e:b2dc (talk) 09:26, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Here is a source that seems to speak to this issue: Blurring Boundaries: The Limits of "White Town" in Colonial Calcutta(Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Vol. 59, No. 2 (Jun., 2000), pp. 154-179). As a Jstor link, this is available through Wikipedia library (for those who are eligible ... I would appreciate hearing from people about their experience with WP library, as I generally find access to WP library to be very problematic.) Fabrickator (talk) 17:22, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected edit request on 11 November 2021. Kolkata's gdp is more than 250 bilion us doller
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Please revert vandalism. March 2nd's change by Rajen Gain (changing the description of a cathedral to "Hindu temple", that of the business district to "poverty" and that of a tram to "slums") is not only nonsensical but also broke the formatting. Nikolaj'u (talk) 16:25, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is a general question: why does Wikipedia cover articles of cities as if they are a travel guide or advertisement? Kolkata is a wonderful city but it has serious problems of poverty, sanitation, shortages, etc, and there is insufficient coverage of that IMO. If this article (and others like it) were truly balanced, the images and data would discuss the urban problems in greater detail. 2601:14B:4400:4365:2C59:BCFF:46F6:531B (talk) 12:48, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. melecie t 07:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)