Talk:Mapuche conflict
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Page views for this article over the last 30 days | ||
---|---|---|
Detailed traffic statistics |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mapuche conflict. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20000930121730/http://www.xs4all.nl/~rehue/art/lava1.html to http://www.xs4all.nl/~rehue/art/lava1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Too much emphasis on violence and crime?
When researching the topic of the article it is striking that almost all coverage about it is related to violent events (arson, deaths) or crime (theft, alledged drug trafficking). It would be helpful to find out and include in the article non-violent and non-criminal aspects of the conflict. Also, scholarly sources that analyse the nature of the conflict are needed. Right now the article relies to much on newspapers and sources or people who may have stake in the conflict. Dentren | Talk 14:34, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
No infobox?
Why doesn't this article have an infobox? Almost every other article about an armed conflict has one. Charles Essie (talk) 02:24, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Region with least potential seceding
Can anyone explain to me this. Araucania is Chile's poorest region. The Mapuche are the least educated people. Araucanians produce $4800 per capita GDP and the mean income is $5900 in Araucania. Are the Mapuche sure they will live better in independent Mapuchia without Antofagasta money flowing to them?
- C-Class Chile articles
- Mid-importance Chile articles
- WikiProject Chile articles
- C-Class Indigenous peoples of the Americas articles
- Low-importance Indigenous peoples of the Americas articles
- Indigenous peoples of the Americas articles
- C-Class Argentine articles
- Mid-importance Argentine articles
- WikiProject Argentina articles
- C-Class Human rights articles
- Low-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles