Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CamFind
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:58, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- CamFind (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability has not been established by WP:RS. Amigao (talk) 02:00, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Photography, Internet, and Software. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 02:23, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - Meets WP:GNG by virtue of having significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject,[1][2][3][4] and meets WP:NSOFT by virtue of the numerous reviews of the software.[5][6][7][8] - Aoidh (talk) 02:48, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:40, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:53, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - The first four sources listed by Aoidh are sufficient to meet the GNG. —Danre98(talk^contribs) 04:20, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.