Talk:Constitution of Bhutan

Bhutan C‑class Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bhutan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bhutan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BhutanWikipedia:WikiProject BhutanTemplate:WikiProject BhutanBhutan articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law C‑class

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Constitution of Bhutan appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 October 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Constitution of Bhutan is based on Buddhist philosophy, International Conventions on Human Rights, public opinion, and existing laws, authorities, and precedents?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/October.

Wikipedia

Comment and Interpretation?

Certain unreferenced statements in the Fundamental Rights section of the article such as:

"This is analogous to the guarantees of the American Equal Protection Clause and is an example of laws generally against institutional discrimination on the basis of status."

"This is a legal tautology for freedom of religion"

"This is analogous to the Common Law concepts of "eminent domain" and "just compensation"

look like interpretation or assertation. Please give a citation for these. LodroD (talk) 09:17, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for those bits. I've re-written them to look less like opinion. However, I don't think there's any problem with the statement about freedom of religion, as long as you understand tautology and freedom of religion. If anyone thinks it's something else, how about re-write it! Editing is so much more helpful than tagging. Cheers. JFHJr (㊟) 06:18, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 38 external links on Constitution of Bhutan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:13, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

History

Constitution of Bhutan 119.2.118.120 (talk) 14:50, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]