Talk:The Cadfael Chronicles
Appearance
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Untitled
split from Cadfael per suggestion. Accotink2 talk 13:12, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
More than Start class article
This article is more than Start class. It is well-written, with citations. I hope it can be reviewed and raised up in class. --Prairieplant (talk) 16:21, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
No sources, possibly OR
On the contrary to the poster above: the article cites barely no sources and states a lot of unsourced facts and opinions. Basically two thirds of it should be omitted by WP guidelines on the near future, if someone doesnt work in sources. (I am not able to do this.) 95.90.129.104 (talk) 10:54, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class novel articles
- Mid-importance novel articles
- Start-Class Crime fiction task force articles
- Unknown-importance Crime fiction task force articles
- WikiProject Novels articles
- Start-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- Start-Class British television articles
- Unknown-importance British television articles
- British television task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- Start-Class Women writers articles
- Mid-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles