Talk:SIG MCX

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SIG MCX article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 2 months

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Firearms Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Politics: Gun politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Gun politics task force.

Now a service rifle?

Do I understand this is now the M-5 and has been adopted as the standard (Army) infantry rifle? --PaulinSaudi (talk) 21:31, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, the m-5 is based on a completely different but related rifle the SIG MCX Spear. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 21:52, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. PaulinSaudi (talk) 09:03, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16.6 in "Sport" variant?

I do not want to introduce inaccurate information, but it appears that in 2019 there was a variant "MCX VIRTUS SPORT" in with a 16.6 in barrel. It may be that it was produced by SIG Sauer Germany(?), [1] [2] And a number of these models appear to have been sold, but it may be that production was cut short because the German branch of sigsauer.swiss was shut down shortly after. In some places, apparently a 16.6 in variant is still on sale, but sometimes now dubbed MCX Virtus Patrol instead of "Sport"? [3][4][5] I find no evidence of a 16.6 in version existing on the US market. --dab (𒁳) 11:23, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

from the archived pdf of the Bundeskriminalamt assessment, it is possible that they had to change the 16 in version to 16.6 in in order to comply with German legislation of what counts as a sports rifle. Maybe that's all this is, they extended the barrel by .6 in so they could sell it to German sport shooters. --dab (𒁳) 11:26, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]