Talk:Melonpan

Flavor

I'd rather say they are meant to be melon-flavoured, which does not mean that they actually taste like melons, of course. Melon baking flavouring is available in many supermarkets.

In the book Japanese food and cooking by Emi Kazuko, it states "MELON PAN - This is a yellow fluffy bun, with sugar coating on top. It is called melon pan because of the colour and shape, and has nothing to do with the taste. It has a crisp sugary texture outside but light bread inside, and a sweet flavour." The melon pan I have ate were not melon flavoured.

In yakitate, the meronpans they make all have real meron in them (though azuma's has only meron juice). I assume that the merchandise version http://mz1200.seesaa.net/image/IMG_6481.jpg tastes of meron too.

That was the main point to the joke about Azuma Kazuma not being very good with melonpan. The main reason he thought he wasn't any good with it was that he didn't understand why it was called melonpan when in reality, there isn't always melon in it.

---

They are melon flavored to Japanese people. In general, sweets are less strongly flavored in Japan (as well as being less sweet), so foreigners sometimes fail to perceive subtle flavors.

Anime references

Do we really need so many references to different anime cartoons? Can we just shorten it to "Melon pan is mentioned to many anime cartoons"? Caradea 23:26, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

I see a total of one. *(unsigned)*

I agree; this is silly. Melonpan is a kind of bread that you can buy at the convenience store or grocery store in Japan. Everyone eats it. To say that anime characters eat it is like putting similar notes under the article for chicken. Dekimasu 09:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

It would indeed be absurd to mention every single time melonpan is eaten in an anime cartoon. However, I didn't think briefly mentioning Shakugan no Shana was irrelevant, since the main character is seen eating melonpan (with great gusto) at least once per episode on average. The erasing - within mere hours and without a single word of explanation - of what I had written strikes me as a bit discourteous. Baldric_FR 25/08/06

I wasn't the one who erased your addition, but it wasn't with a single word of explanation. I noted that the edit summary directed you to the talk page, and it was probably made by an editor who (like me) has this page on his watchlist. However, in response, I continue to view this as irrelevant. It may be relevant to the topic Shakugan no Shana if it has become a significant plot element. However, it is not significant to the topic of melonpan, which is first and foremost a type of bread (how does this add to someone's understanding of melonpan?). A survey of anime references is not likely to be useful or relevant to someone reading this article. I am going to re-revert this now, but I hope that you won't be offended. If other editors side with you, of course I would respect that. Dekimasu 11:15, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

This argument can be extended to the popular culture section in general. I note that (from Wikipedia_talk:Trivia):

That should be required reading for anyone participating in this debate. What's said there about Marduk could apply to just about any other article about a deity or other mythological figure:

• Osiris: "In the movie Hedwig and the Angry Inch, Hedwig's song "Origin of Love" mentions Osiris";
• Apollo: "The original classic 1978 Battlestar Galactia series. The main character of the show was called Apollo. Who was an ace Viper pilot (space fighter planes seen throughout the series) and the Captain and strike leader of Galactica's Blue Squadron."
• Quetzalcoatl: "In the computer game Rise of Legends, there is a playable race called Cuotl. There are also air units in this race's army called 'Quetzals'."

Etc, etc, etc, by way of Kokopelli, Ozymandias, Sigurd, King Arthur... (the list goes on). Adopting the Marduk solution (wiping it all off and depositing it on Marduk in popular culture) as general practice would enable such articles to give a much better impression (seriousness, rigor, perspective) than they do at the moment. Bolivian Unicyclist 12:24, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

It's a tenable solution. But, then, this is an encyclopedia, not an indiscriminate collection of information. I think editors are perfectly within their rights to delete random trivia factoids on sight. And I'd caution against avoiding "popular culture" sections altogether; these can be nice additions to articles, provided they are well written, academically sound, and analytical rather than exhaustive. I'm currently reading a book on Jeki la Njambè (sadly, we have no article yet), an oral epic of the Duala people of Cameroon, and the author devotes quite a few pages to interpretations in Cameroonian popular culture. So I guess I'm trying to say: If you've got something intelligent to say about Fujin in popular culture, say it. If all you have is the fact that a character in Final Fantasy VIII is named Fujin, keep it to yourself or put it in the Fujin (Final Fantasy character) article. But ghettoizing these sections to X in popular culture is akin to sweeping the dust under the rug. — BrianSmithson 13:04, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

If the references do not add to anyone's understanding of melonpan, they should be out of the article. We should not forget that the fact that a reference is interesting doesn't make it notable or encyclopedic. Dekimasu 07:45, 3 October 2006 (UTC)