Talk:Manic Monday

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Manic Monday article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Manic Monday has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 9, 2010	Peer review	Reviewed
September 23, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pop music GA‑class Mid‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Songs GA‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women in Music GA‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

2003 Guardian Interview

Tbhotch: I don't know if you're interested in expanding the article, but I found an interview in The Guardian from 2003 that briefly touches upon the song:[1]

But they did find themselves in the peculiar situation of having a string of hits that didn't really sound like them. It began when Prince took a shine to the band and gave them a present: a box containing a tape of Manic Monday. Despite painfully rhyming "Sunday" with "I-don't-have-to-run day", it was an international hit. It was also their eventual undoing. The Bangles' cherished insistence that they were equals and didn't have a traditional frontperson evaporated in the face of Hoffs' lead vocal and false press rumours of a romance with Prince.
"It was a slippery slope," says Peterson. "By the time we released singles where it really was multiple vocals, it didn't really defuse that perception. People like to paint it as girls having a catfight but it was more the frustration of not being perceived as a unit."

A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 23:18, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you A Quest for that useful information, I just added, and thus these rumors are closed. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 00:38, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Manic Monday/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: — Legolas ^(talk2me) 12:05, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tbhotch, I will be starting the review of the article soon. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 12:05, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful work, there just some MoS and formatting issues which I can happily do, as its an easy pass. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 10:59, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PS, my personal favourite is always "Venus". — Legolas ^(talk2me) 10:59, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review and the c/e, is greatly appreciated. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 17:51, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Manic Monday. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:46, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Progression

The progression, from D to A7 in the beginning, is all wrong. Anyone without a tin ear can hear it. Unfortunately, this error has been propagated to many other 'pedias'. Brett Alexander Hunter (talk) 13:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]