Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oon Yeoh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 20:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oon Yeoh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable blogger and the only sources I can really find related to him are written by him. Appears to fail WP:GNG. Despite winning a 1995 world Judo championship, I can find nothing to support that and in fact the only mentions I've found parrot this article which has been unsourced for nearly 3 years and I don't see that changing. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:25, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:46, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:46, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:46, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:46, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Just to be clear he did not win the World Judo championship just attended. Medalling would be notable, attending not really.PRehse (talk) 22:03, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are no references given and the external link is to his personal website, so WP:GNG is not met. He did compete at two world championships, losing his first match in one and winning a round of 64 match in the other (before losing his next two matches). Merely competing in these events has not been considered sufficient to warrent inclusion in the past. Papaursa (talk) 03:31, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SophisticatedSwampert ^{let's talk about that} 04:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails to pass WP:GNG, there is a clear lack of independent and reliable sources here that would let us keep this article. Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 07:29, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.