Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DMM.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep. The nomination was withdrawn by the nominator, and the only other user who !voted "Delete" changed his !vote. The sources provided in the discussion are considered to be enough to establish notability. (non-admin closure) Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:11, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DMM.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Previously deleted (A7) article, written like a spam/ad (WP:ADVERT), about a website/company which does not meet WP:NORG or WP:WEB.~~ nafSadh did say 16:45, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn per sources provided by Wikimandia (Мандичка). --nafSadh did say 03:54, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 18:35, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 18:35, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as no evidence of notability provided. Article is extremely spammy. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 20:03, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Change to Keep based on the sources given by Мандичка. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 19:54, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets basic requirements with sufficient coverage ([1], [2], [3]), finance articles about its securities trading, and additional coverage based on its robot thing, including an article in English that refers to it as "popular Japanese online retailer DMM.com." Also appears to have notability based on coverage of its online gaming and adult sites, but I didn't look too deeply into that. —Мандичка^YO 😜 22:59, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. May need de-spamming, but the article clearly meets the basic notability guidelines as well as WP:NORG. --DAJF (talk) 15:40, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.