Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dag Creative Media

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:14, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dag Creative Media

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP notability. Notability is not inherited from film awards. Brianhe (talk) 19:34, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 20:06, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 20:06, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 20:06, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now and draft and userfy if needed as the best I found was this, this and this. SwisterTwister talk 04:30, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

deeper searches:

short name:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

founder:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

and WP:INDAFD: "Dag Creative" "Dag Creative Media" "Rana Sarka"

Comment: It seems this company gets a lot of mentions in multiple sources. While I am not so willing to simply suggest a delete, the article needs to be expanded and far better sourced for me to opine a keep. WP:SEP under WP:ITJ anyone? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 10:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In some cases I'm eager to expand tne article after good sources are uncovered, but because of WP:BOGO, not this one. See WP:COIN#Raju Kapuria and others (permlink) for reasons why I think this article is tainted. Others may have a different conclusion, which is fine, but this is mine. – Brianhe (talk) 13:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:49, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.