Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Rowland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 14:33, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Rowland

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is not inherited, no other significant claim of notability present. If this article wasn't several years old, I would have used CSD:A7. Versa geek 23:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 01:20, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 01:20, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete rather than actually redirect to his father' article as there's likely simply not much for a better article (I actually reviewed this when it started). SwisterTwister talk 03:53, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 18:33, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –Fredddie ™ 15:54, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above editors. Searches turned up nothing to show they meet notability criteria. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.