Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ignacio del Rio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:58, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ignacio del Rio[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over. This is, in its current form, essentially a combination of autobiography (bad) and promotional external link farm (very bad). The person looks to be possibly notable enough for an article, but not this article. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:49, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - Artist with no evidence of notability .→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:34, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A WP:SPA article by the near-eponymous 1936IDRio, illustrated by watermarked images, indicating WP:COI. Clearly a working and exhibiting artist but the WP:ARTIST criteria are much higher than that and I can find nothing to indicate that the subject meets them. AllyD (talk) 06:09, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.