Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean-Louis Bourgeois
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:48, 7 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 05:48, 7 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Per the additional sources disclosed in the discussion. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 21:26, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Jean-Louis Bourgeois (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only published one book and notability is not inherited. Didn't want to take the flak on a speedy deletion Marcus Qwertyus 00:00, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
the one book is one of the foremost treatises on the subject and traces the genre all around the globe Masterknighted (talk) 00:15, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to articles on one or both of parents. No need to lose contents and history for someone who will likely become more notable with future publications. Freakshownerd (talk) 22:41, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per sources that discuss more than just the book.[1][2][3][4] Phil Bridger (talk) 15:23, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep further notability and work has been substantiated Masterknighted (talk) 01:23, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.