Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis and the Brothel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 17:55, 7 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 17:55, 7 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 00:15, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Louis and the Brothel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tiny article (one line) about a noted documentary artists' much less known documentary. No encyclopedic value, as Wikipedia is not the TV guide. Would not be opposed to a merge with Louis Theroux, although there is only one line of content here, so there is little to actually merge. Would not be opposed to a redirect to Louis Theroux if merge is rejected. Sven Manguard Talk 16:39, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Subject is also covered adequately at Louis Theroux's BBC 2 Specials. Content is mostly the same. Would not object to merge or redirect to that page either. Sven Manguard Talk 16:46, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep found a source and I am sure there are more per WP:BEFORE Dwanyewest (talk) 23:05, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for {{rescue}} by the Article Rescue Squadron. SnottyWong confess 00:52, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You found a source proving the documentry exists, you still have not demonstrated notability, IMO. This is not TV Guide, being on TV in and of itself is not inherently notable enough. Sven Manguard Talk 03:08, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep You just have to click on the News search link above to see that there are numerous sources. Colonel Warden (talk) 10:02, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Article has been inproved since AfD listing and is shown to be notable per WP:N requirements with reliable sources. - Hydroxonium (talk) 15:22, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.